<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Privacy is not an option</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasoneiseman.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasoneiseman.com/blog/?p=210</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:45:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.jasoneiseman.com/blog/?p=210&#038;cpage=1#comment-9129</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasoneiseman.com/blog/?p=210#comment-9129</guid>
		<description>Obviously the are a lot of online faux pas. I would say that in the sense that I used it, yes an online faux pas is revealing too much information, inappropriate information, or information that needs to be secure in an insecure location.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously the are a lot of online faux pas. I would say that in the sense that I used it, yes an online faux pas is revealing too much information, inappropriate information, or information that needs to be secure in an insecure location.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.jasoneiseman.com/blog/?p=210&#038;cpage=1#comment-9121</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasoneiseman.com/blog/?p=210#comment-9121</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for continuing the conversation, and sorry it has taken me a while to get back to it.  I&#039;m glad you posted about the issue because I meant for my post to be at least a bit provocative!

&quot;Online faux pas&quot; is an interesting term.  Does it equal &quot;Being transparent when it isn&#039;t advantageous for you to be?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for continuing the conversation, and sorry it has taken me a while to get back to it.  I&#8217;m glad you posted about the issue because I meant for my post to be at least a bit provocative!</p>
<p>&#8220;Online faux pas&#8221; is an interesting term.  Does it equal &#8220;Being transparent when it isn&#8217;t advantageous for you to be?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
